Unit name | Applied Security |
---|---|
Unit code | COMS30901 |
Credit points | 10 |
Level of study | H/6 |
Teaching block(s) |
Teaching Block 2 (weeks 13 - 24) |
Unit director | Dr. Page |
Open unit status | Not open |
Pre-requisites |
COMS30124 |
Co-requisites |
Other units within the “cryptography and security” theme. |
School/department | Department of Computer Science |
Faculty | Faculty of Engineering |
The aim of this unit is to introduce and explore the implementation and deployment of secure systems, focussing on their cryptographic aspects in particular. It offers a different perspective on what it means for something to be “secure” (e.g., stressing the importance of secure implementation techniques), and the difficulty of deploying systems in which cryptography is used (e.g., stressing the need for secure building blocks such as random number generators). Students completing the unit should get hands-on experience with modern, industrially relevant attack techniques and associated countermeasures, and opportunity to integrate content from other units in the programme within whole secure systems rather than disjoint components.
The aim of this unit is to introduce and explore the implementation and deployment of secure systems, focussing on their cryptographic aspects in particular. It offers a different perspective on what it means for something to be “secure” (e.g., stressing the importance of secure implementation techniques), and the difficulty of deploying systems in which cryptography is used (e.g., stressing the need for secure building blocks such as random number generators). Students completing the unit should get hands-on experience with modern, industrially relevant attack techniques and associated countermeasures, and opportunity to integrate content from other units in the programme within whole secure systems rather than disjoint components.
The syllabus will include (but is not limited to):
On successful completion of this unit, students will be able to:
Roughly 3/4 of teaching is in lecture and taught laboratory or problem class format; we expect that the laboratory format will include non-assessed worksheets, and worked examples which are not appropriate to a traditional lecture format.
Assessment for the unit is 30% via coursework assignments (primarily technical and programming exercises rather than written essays) and 70% via a 2-hour examination.
The idea is to distinguish the level-3 and level-M units via different assessment; we envisage the coursework assessments comprising a portfolio of 2 assignments (from 4 options) for the level-3 students, and 3 assignments (from 4 options) for the level-M students. Further, we envisage a common core for the exam (say part 1) and a split between level-3 and level-M students (for part 2). This acts to balance the teaching load, while satisfying advanced assessment criteria for the level-M students.