Unit name | Professional Issues in Health Care Ethics and Law |
---|---|
Unit code | MEDIM6003 |
Credit points | 15 |
Level of study | M/7 |
Teaching block(s) |
Academic Year (weeks 1 - 52) |
Unit director | Professor. Huxtable |
Open unit status | Not open |
Pre-requisites |
MEDIM6000, MEDIM6001 |
Co-requisites |
None |
School/department | Bristol Medical School (PHS) |
Faculty | Faculty of Health Sciences |
Subject matter to be covered will include: (i.) ethical and legal issues relating to the vulnerable professional, including inter-professional obligations, professionals at risk, (ii.) ethical and legal issues of conscience, including conscientious objection and "whistle-blowing", and (iii.) ethical and legal issues relating to justice in health care, including avoiding discrimination and societal obligations, such as allocating limited resources.
Aims:
This Unit aims to provide students with a systematic understanding and critical awareness of further key issues surrounding the role of the health care professional, with regard both for the individual patient and society at large. The Unit will focus students’ attention on theoretical justifications for, and ethical and legal obligations arising in relation to, work in the health care professions including professionals’ self-care and care of others. Students will learn to distinguish between, critically appraise and apply some of the theories relating to professionalism, conscience and justice and will gain greater insight into and ability to critically reflect on the legal and professional obligations in this context.
On successful completion of this Unit, students will be able to:
Student centred teaching & learning strategies will be promoted using the following methods:
Assessment in this unit will comprise one summative 3,000 word essay. The essay will test student’s abilities to critically analyse a topic covered in this unit which relates to their broad area of professional practice. This would, for example, involve engagement with an existing debate in relevant literature.
Students will situate their evaluation of the debate in their own area of practice so that the more successful students bring insight into the debate and relate these to their professional practice.