Unit name | The Renaissance: Polyphonic Mass |
---|---|
Unit code | MUSIM0146 |
Credit points | 20 |
Level of study | M/7 |
Teaching block(s) |
Teaching Block 2 (weeks 13 - 24) |
Unit director | Dr. Allinson |
Open unit status | Not open |
Pre-requisites |
None |
Co-requisites |
None |
School/department | Department of Music |
Faculty | Faculty of Arts |
The Renaissance Polyphonic Mass
By 1450 the Mass had become the grandest musical genre a composer of polyphony could tackle. The theorist Tinctoris classified it the cantus magnus, ranking it above the motet and chanson in prestige.
In this course we will survey the diverse ways in which composers set the words of the Mass Ordinary (that is: Kyrie, Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, Agnus Dei). How did composers structure their textures? How did they create coherence across and within the lengthy movements? We will spend time looking in detail at the output of key figures, including early pioneers like Du Fay, Ockeghem, Obrecht and Josquin; we will examine national trends, stopping off in 16th century England, Germany and the Franco-Flemish lands; then, towards the end of the course we will meet the high Renaissance masters of the genre: Palestrina, Lassus, Victoria and, of course, Byrd.
While some of the course is focussed on the technical elements of compositional process and style, the music will be set against its intellectual, social and religious background; for example, the Reformation and Counter-Reformation. Students will be encouraged to score-read, analyse and listen to this (frequently breathtaking) repertory and to develop a discriminating sense of style.
This unit aims:
By the end of the module, students are expected to (1) be able to describe with confidence the techniques and procedures employed in the renaissance polyphonic mass (2) have a good knowledge of the intellectual and social background that informed the repertoire (3) write critically and perceptively about the composers, styles, and social context of the renaissance polyphonic mass, using appropriate language and terminology And additionally (specific to Levels H and M) to: (4) engage with, and perhaps critique, the theoretical constructs that underpin different scholarly interpretations of music of this period And additionally (specific to level M) to: (5) make, defend and critique arguments orally (6) apply existing analytical strategies to Masses not discussed in class, with flexibility and creativity (7) demonstrate the capacity for independent research
9x2 hour classes for the whole cohort (including the MA presentations) 1x2 hour tutorial for the MA students
MA: One essay, independently devised and researched, of 4000 words (75%). This will demonstrate (1), (2), (4) and (7) through (3). PLUS one individual 15-minute presentation on an independently-researched topic, distinct from that of the essay (25%). This will demonstrate (6) and (7) through (5)
New Grove Online: ‘Mass’, esp. II, 5-9. J Haar (ed.), European Music, 1520-1640 (Woodbridge, 2006), esp. ch.7: A.W. Atlas, ‘Music for the Mass’. A.W. Atlas, Renaissance Music: Music in Western Europe, 1400-1600 (New York & London, 1998) L.L. Perkins, Music in the Age of the Renaissance (New York & London, 1999) R. Sherr (ed.), The Josquin Companion (Oxford, 2000) H. Mayer Brown, Music in the Renaissance, rev. ed. Louise Stein (Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999)