Unit information: The Ethics of Migration and Citizenship in 2025/26

Please note: Programme and unit information may change as the relevant academic field develops. We may also make changes to the structure of programmes and assessments to improve the student experience.

Unit name The Ethics of Migration and Citizenship
Unit code PHIL30118
Credit points 20
Level of study H/6
Teaching block(s) Teaching Block 1 (weeks 1 - 12)
Unit director Dr. Buxton
Open unit status Not open
Units you must take before you take this one (pre-requisite units)

None

Units you must take alongside this one (co-requisite units)

None

Units you may not take alongside this one

None

School/department Department of Philosophy
Faculty Faculty of Arts

Unit Information

Much political philosophy proceeds on the assumption that states exercise sovereignty over the set of citizens who live on their territory. If democracy is the right form of government, the principle of democratic legitimacy presumes that those over whom power is exercised have a right to a say in government. But in real life, the presence of people who are non-members on the territory, the fact that many citizens live elsewhere and the right that states claim to control their borders makes this picture problematic. Moreover, the distribution of many important goods and freedoms to people is conditioned by their citizenship status: if you have the citizenship of a wealthy liberal democracy, your prospects in life are vastly better than if you are born the citizen of a poor country in sub-Saharan Africa. This unit is about how the normative questions of how we allocate and ought to allocate citizenship, of what states owe to non-members (both within and outside the territory). It asks how membership is justified and who ought to be a member and on what grounds, how living with people from different cultures and ethnicities might affect how liberal democracies should be organized, what we owe to people who are failed or persecuted by their country of origin (refugees and asylum seekers) and whether the right that states claim to control their borders and exclude outsiders is justified or not. The unit will be taught by a combination of lectures and seminars.

Your learning on this unit

On successful completion of this unit, students will be able to:

1. Explain the main philosophical arguments for and against the right of states to manage migration and their connection to positions in debates on global justice.

2. Explain the main philosophical disagreements around the concepts of citizenship, toleration, and multiculturalism.

3. Explain the key arguments around the rights of refugees, their human rights, and state obligations to them.

4. Conduct a small-scale policy-oriented critical response.

5. Present sophisticated arguments in structured writing.

How you will learn

Lectures, small group work, individual exercises, seminars and virtual learning environment.

How you will be assessed

Tasks which help you learn and prepare you for summative tasks (formative): 

None

Tasks which count towards your unit mark (summative):

Critical Response (20%) [ILOs 1-4]

Essay (3000 words) (80%) [ILOs 1-3, 5]

Resources

If this unit has a Resource List, you will normally find a link to it in the Blackboard area for the unit. Sometimes there will be a separate link for each weekly topic.

If you are unable to access a list through Blackboard, you can also find it via the Resource Lists homepage. Search for the list by the unit name or code (e.g. PHIL30118).

How much time the unit requires
Each credit equates to 10 hours of total student input. For example a 20 credit unit will take you 200 hours of study to complete. Your total learning time is made up of contact time, directed learning tasks, independent learning and assessment activity.

See the University Workload statement relating to this unit for more information.

Assessment
The assessment methods listed in this unit specification are designed to enable students to demonstrate the named learning outcomes (LOs). Where a disability prevents a student from undertaking a specific method of assessment, schools will make reasonable adjustments to support a student to demonstrate the LO by an alternative method or with additional resources.

The Board of Examiners will consider all cases where students have failed or not completed the assessments required for credit. The Board considers each student's outcomes across all the units which contribute to each year's programme of study. For appropriate assessments, if you have self-certificated your absence, you will normally be required to complete it the next time it runs (for assessments at the end of TB1 and TB2 this is usually in the next re-assessment period).
The Board of Examiners will take into account any exceptional circumstances and operates within the Regulations and Code of Practice for Taught Programmes.