Unit name | Engineering Biology Research Project 2 |
---|---|
Unit code | SEMTM0006 |
Credit points | 60 |
Level of study | M/7 |
Teaching block(s) |
Academic Year (weeks 1 - 52) |
Unit director | Dr. Jessica Cross |
Open unit status | Not open |
Units you must take before you take this one (pre-requisite units) |
Foundational training (delivered in Oxford, does not bear credit). |
Units you must take alongside this one (co-requisite units) |
None |
Units you may not take alongside this one |
None |
School/department | School of Engineering Mathematics and Technology |
Faculty | Faculty of Engineering |
Why is this unit important?
This unit will provide students with first-hand experience of individual research focused on open problems in Engineering Biology. Projects will have at least two academic/industry supervisors with complementary expertise (e.g. experimental and modelling), with at least one supervisor from the student’s home institution.
How does the unit fit into your programme of study?
This unit offers a unique opportunity to perform individual research on challenging EngBio projects, supervised by industrialists and academics. It will provide key research and soft skills and will allow students to experience working in different groups and on different topics before choosing their PhD projects. For most students, one of their individual EngBio Research Projects will become the foundation of their PhD.
Overview of the content
Students will work on individual projects as full-time researchers over 11 weeks.
The research project will align with one or more of four major focus areas:
Projects will be co-created with supervisors; there is the possibility to have industrial supervisors, or to complete the project at a partner’s group/industry.
How will students, personally, be different as a result of the unit
Student will have gained new skills in research project conception, design, management and execution. They will also have learned how to effectively work in an interdisciplinary supervisory setting, how to prepare a scientific poster and how to defend their projects in a viva.
Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of the unit, students will be able to:
Ongoing project supervision will be provided by regular meetings with project supervisors. Students will also have access to skills training workshops and online resources covering topics from project management and managing your supervisor to writing up.
Tasks which help you learn and prepare you for summative tasks (formative):
Review of project plans upon discussions with supervisors; discussions of report drafts before submission (drafts to be shared with supervisors at least 3 weeks before final report submission deadline).
Tasks which count towards your unit mark (summative):
Assessment 1 (70%): conference-style individual scientific poster (both electronic and paper-based) (ILOs 1-5)
Assessment 2 (30%): oral viva (ILO4)
When assessment does not go to plan
Re-assessment takes the same form as the original summative assessment. If you pass one of the summative assessments, then your mark for this can be carried forward towards your final mark and you will only have to be reassessed on the assessment that you did not pass.
If this unit has a Resource List, you will normally find a link to it in the Blackboard area for the unit. Sometimes there will be a separate link for each weekly topic.
If you are unable to access a list through Blackboard, you can also find it via the Resource Lists homepage. Search for the list by the unit name or code (e.g. SEMTM0006).
How much time the unit requires
Each credit equates to 10 hours of total student input. For example a 20 credit unit will take you 200 hours
of study to complete. Your total learning time is made up of contact time, directed learning tasks,
independent learning and assessment activity.
See the University Workload statement relating to this unit for more information.
Assessment
The assessment methods listed in this unit specification are designed to enable students to demonstrate the named learning outcomes (LOs). Where a disability prevents a student from undertaking a specific method of assessment, schools will make reasonable adjustments to support a student to demonstrate the LO by an alternative method or with additional resources.
The Board of Examiners will consider all cases where students have failed or not completed the assessments required for credit.
The Board considers each student's outcomes across all the units which contribute to each year's programme of study. For appropriate assessments, if you have self-certificated your absence, you will normally be required to complete it the next time it runs (for assessments at the end of TB1 and TB2 this is usually in the next re-assessment period).
The Board of Examiners will take into account any exceptional circumstances and operates
within the Regulations and Code of Practice for Taught Programmes.